Cuba vs Suriname: Average non-HDL cholesterol levels
Cuba
3.3
in 2018
Suriname
3.3
in 2018
Cuba rank
95th
Suriname rank
95th
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels over time
- Cuba
- Suriname
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 3.3 against 3.3 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.6 | 3.5 | 0.1 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 3.51 | 3.45 | 0.06 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 3.4 | 3.4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3.33 | 3.34 | 0.0111 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average non-hdl cholesterol levels, Cuba or Suriname?
- Cuba, at 3.3 against 3.3 in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average non-hdl cholesterol levels between Cuba and Suriname?
- 0, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Suriname?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Cuba and Suriname rank globally for average non-hdl cholesterol levels?
- Cuba ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average non-HDL cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The estimated average level of non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, commonly known as "bad cholesterol". Healthy levels are considered to be under 4mmol/L. Elevated levels of non-HDL cholesterol are a risk factor for chronic complications, including cardiovascular disease, and premature death.