Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Average non hdl cholesterol levels
Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.3
in 2018
Suriname
3.3
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
93rd
Suriname rank
93rd
Average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Suriname
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.3 against 3.3 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 93rd of 189 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.68 | 3.5 | 0.18 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 3.7 | 3.45 | 0.25 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 3.55 | 3.4 | 0.15 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.36 | 3.34 | 0.0111 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average non hdl cholesterol levels, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Suriname?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.3 against 3.3 in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average non hdl cholesterol levels between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname rank globally for average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 93rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.