Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sri Lanka: Average non hdl cholesterol levels
Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.3
in 2018
Sri Lanka
3.3
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
93rd
Sri Lanka rank
93rd
Average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.3 against 3.3 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 189 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.68 | 2.8 | 0.88 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 3.7 | 2.95 | 0.75 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 3.55 | 3.13 | 0.42 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.36 | 3.28 | 0.0778 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average non hdl cholesterol levels, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sri Lanka?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.3 against 3.3 in Sri Lanka as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average non hdl cholesterol levels between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka rank globally for average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.