Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kiribati: Average non hdl cholesterol levels
Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.3
in 2018
Kiribati
3.3
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
93rd
Kiribati rank
93rd
Average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kiribati
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.3 against 3.3 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Kiribati ranks 93rd of 189 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.68 | 3.39 | 0.29 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 3.7 | 3.4 | 0.3 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 3.55 | 3.33 | 0.22 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.36 | 3.3 | 0.0556 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average non hdl cholesterol levels, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kiribati?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.3 against 3.3 in Kiribati as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average non hdl cholesterol levels between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kiribati?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kiribati?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kiribati rank globally for average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Kiribati ranks 93rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.