Belgium vs Nauru: Average non hdl cholesterol levels
Belgium
3.1
in 2018
Nauru
3.1
in 2018
Belgium rank
134th
Nauru rank
134th
Average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Belgium
- Nauru
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 3.1 against 3.1 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 134th and Nauru ranks 134th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.63 | 4.02 | 0.61 | Belgium |
| 1990s | 4.2 | 4.07 | 0.13 | Belgium |
| 2000s | 3.66 | 3.76 | 0.1 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 3.22 | 3.32 | 0.1 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average non hdl cholesterol levels, Belgium or Nauru?
- Belgium, at 3.1 against 3.1 in Nauru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average non hdl cholesterol levels between Belgium and Nauru?
- 0, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nauru?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Nauru rank globally for average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Belgium ranks 134th and Nauru ranks 134th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.