Belarus vs East Timor: Average non hdl cholesterol levels
Belarus
3.2
in 2018
East Timor
3.2
in 2018
Belarus rank
118th
East Timor rank
118th
Average non hdl cholesterol levels over time
- Belarus
- East Timor
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 3.2 against 3.2 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 118th and East Timor ranks 118th of 191 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4 | 2.68 | 1.32 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 3.92 | 2.89 | 1.03 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 3.69 | 3.06 | 0.63 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 3.39 | 3.16 | 0.2333 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average non hdl cholesterol levels, Belarus or East Timor?
- Belarus, at 3.2 against 3.2 in East Timor as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average non hdl cholesterol levels between Belarus and East Timor?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and East Timor?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and East Timor rank globally for average non hdl cholesterol levels?
- Belarus ranks 118th and East Timor ranks 118th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average non hdl cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.