Barbados vs Kiribati: Average non-HDL cholesterol levels
Barbados
3.3
in 2018
Kiribati
3.3
in 2018
Barbados rank
95th
Kiribati rank
95th
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels over time
- Barbados
- Kiribati
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 3.3 against 3.3 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 95th and Kiribati ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.2 | 3.39 | 0.19 | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 3.16 | 3.4 | 0.24 | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 3.18 | 3.33 | 0.15 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 3.26 | 3.3 | 0.0444 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average non-hdl cholesterol levels, Barbados or Kiribati?
- Barbados, at 3.3 against 3.3 in Kiribati as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average non-hdl cholesterol levels between Barbados and Kiribati?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Kiribati?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Barbados and Kiribati rank globally for average non-hdl cholesterol levels?
- Barbados ranks 95th and Kiribati ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average non-HDL cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The estimated average level of non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, commonly known as "bad cholesterol". Healthy levels are considered to be under 4mmol/L. Elevated levels of non-HDL cholesterol are a risk factor for chronic complications, including cardiovascular disease, and premature death.