Israel vs New Zealand: Average effective retirement men
Israel
69.4
in 2018
New Zealand
69.8
in 2018
Israel rank
8th
New Zealand rank
6th
Average effective retirement men over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 69.8 against 69.4 in Israel, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 49 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.32 | 63.1 | 3.22 | Israel |
| 2000s | 66.02 | 65.41 | 0.61 | Israel |
| 2010s | 68.27 | 67.61 | 0.6556 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average effective retirement men, Israel or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 69.8 against 69.4 in Israel as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average effective retirement men between Israel and New Zealand?
- 0.4, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for average effective retirement men?
- Israel ranks 8th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average effective retirement men. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.