Belgium vs South Africa: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, rural
Belgium
38.47
in 2003
South Africa
39.34
in 2020
Belgium rank
44th
South Africa rank
41st
Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, rural over time
- Belgium
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 39.34 against 38.47 in Belgium, a difference of 0.87.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 41st of 91 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36.94 | 36.82 | 0.1196 | Belgium |
| 2000s | 37.8 | 37.68 | 0.1259 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, rural, Belgium or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 39.34 against 38.47 in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, rural between Belgium and South Africa?
- 0.87, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2003.
- How do Belgium and South Africa rank globally for average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, rural?
- Belgium ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 41st of 91 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.