Belarus vs Guatemala: Augmented Human Development Index: with vs. without income metric
Belarus
0.3556
in 2020
Guatemala
0.3586
in 2020
Belarus rank
97th
Guatemala rank
96th
Augmented Human Development Index: with vs. without income metric over time
- Belarus
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.3586 against 0.3556 in Belarus, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 97th and Guatemala ranks 96th of 162 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2183 | 0.1614 | 0.0569 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 0.4196 | 0.2552 | 0.1644 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.3235 | 0.3225 | 0.001 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.3677 | 0.3677 | 0 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.3556 | 0.3586 | 0.003 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher augmented human development index: with vs. without income metric, Belarus or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 0.3586 against 0.3556 in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in augmented human development index: with vs. without income metric between Belarus and Guatemala?
- 0.003, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guatemala?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Guatemala rank globally for augmented human development index: with vs. without income metric?
- Belarus ranks 97th and Guatemala ranks 96th of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Leandro Prados de la Escosura (2022) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Augmented Human Development Index: with vs. without income metric. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The AHDI seeks to give a historical perspective on human development, in four dimensions: healthy life, knowledge, a decent standard of living, and civil and political freedom.