Brazil vs China: Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes … unit
Brazil
0 trips per US$ of GDP
in 2019
China
0 trips per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Brazil rank
147th
China rank
145th
Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes … unit over time
- Brazil
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0 trips per US$ of GDP against 0 trips per US$ of GDP in Brazil, a difference of 0 trips per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was China ahead.
Brazil ranks 147th and China ranks 145th of 168 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 trips per US$ of GDP | 0 trips per US$ of GDP | 0 trips per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2010s | 0 trips per US$ of GDP | 0 trips per US$ of GDP | 0 trips per US$ of GDP | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, per unit of, Brazil or China?
- China, at 0 trips per US$ of GDP against 0 trips per US$ of GDP in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, per unit of between Brazil and China?
- 0 trips per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and China rank globally for arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, per unit of?
- Brazil ranks 147th and China ranks 145th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.