Cuba vs San Marino: Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled
Cuba
1.60 million trips
in 2022
San Marino
1.42 million trips
in 2015
Cuba rank
66th
San Marino rank
68th
Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- San Marino
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.60 million trips against 1.42 million trips in San Marino, a difference of 185,100 trips.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times San Marino's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 66th and San Marino ranks 68th of 179 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.24 million trips | 1.39 million trips | 847,000 trips | Cuba |
| 2010s | 2.88 million trips | 1.37 million trips | 1.50 million trips | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled, Cuba or San Marino?
- Cuba, at 1.60 million trips against 1.42 million trips in San Marino as of 2022.
- What is the difference in arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled between Cuba and San Marino?
- 185,100 trips, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and San Marino?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Cuba and San Marino rank globally for arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 66th and San Marino ranks 68th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes with 130 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.