Costa Rica vs Estonia: Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled
Costa Rica
2.75 million trips
in 2024
Estonia
2.47 million trips
in 2001
Costa Rica rank
53rd
Estonia rank
56th
Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- Estonia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 2.75 million trips against 2.47 million trips in Estonia, a difference of 281,120 trips.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 53rd and Estonia ranks 56th of 179 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 689,800 trips | 2.10 million trips | 1.41 million trips | Estonia |
| 2000s | 875,000 trips | 2.51 million trips | 1.63 million trips | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Estonia?
- Costa Rica, at 2.75 million trips against 2.47 million trips in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Estonia?
- 281,120 trips, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Estonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2001.
- How do Costa Rica and Estonia rank globally for arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 53rd and Estonia ranks 56th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes with 130 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.