Australia vs Mauritius: Armed forces personnel as a share of total population
Australia
0.2%
in 2020
Mauritius
0.2%
in 2020
Australia rank
110th
Mauritius rank
109th
Armed forces personnel as a share of total population over time
- Australia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Australia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 110th and Mauritius ranks 109th of 173 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.3% | Australia |
| 1990s | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | Australia |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of total population, Australia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of total population between Australia and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritius?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Mauritius rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of total population?
- Australia ranks 110th and Mauritius ranks 109th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of total population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.