Angola vs Slovenia: Armed forces personnel as a share of total population
Angola
0.3%
in 2020
Slovenia
0.3%
in 2020
Angola rank
87th
Slovenia rank
90th
Armed forces personnel as a share of total population over time
- Angola
- Slovenia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 90th of 173 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.2% | Angola |
| 2000s | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of total population, Angola or Slovenia?
- Angola, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Slovenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of total population between Angola and Slovenia?
- 0.0%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Slovenia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Angola and Slovenia rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of total population?
- Angola ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 90th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of total population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.