Algeria vs Georgia: Armed forces personnel as a share of total population
Algeria
0.7%
in 2020
Georgia
0.7%
in 2020
Algeria rank
35th
Georgia rank
37th
Armed forces personnel as a share of total population over time
- Algeria
- Georgia
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 0.7% against 0.7% in Georgia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Georgia ahead.
Algeria ranks 35th and Georgia ranks 37th of 173 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.2% | Algeria |
| 2000s | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.2% | Algeria |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.0% | Algeria |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of total population, Algeria or Georgia?
- Algeria, at 0.7% against 0.7% in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of total population between Algeria and Georgia?
- 0.0%, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Georgia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2020.
- How do Algeria and Georgia rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of total population?
- Algeria ranks 35th and Georgia ranks 37th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of total population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.