Albania vs Eswatini: Armed forces personnel as a share of total population

Albania
0.3%
in 2020
Eswatini
0.3%
in 1999
Albania rank
98th
Eswatini rank
97th

Armed forces personnel as a share of total population over time

  • Albania
  • Eswatini
0.511.522.5198520022020

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Albania, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.

Albania ranks 98th and Eswatini ranks 97th of 173 countries.

Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel as a share of total population, Albania or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Albania as of 1999.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel as a share of total population between Albania and Eswatini?
0.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Eswatini?
8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
How do Albania and Eswatini rank globally for armed forces personnel as a share of total population?
Albania ranks 98th and Eswatini ranks 97th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Armed forces personnel as a share of total population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel as a share of total population
Unit
%
Source
The Military Balance - International Institute for Strategic Studies, via World Bank (2026); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
173 places, 5,352 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if their training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.