South Sudan vs Tanzania: Area of permanent meadows and pastures
South Sudan
25.77 million hectares
in 2023
Tanzania
24.00 million hectares
in 2023
South Sudan rank
29th
Tanzania rank
32nd
Area of permanent meadows and pastures over time
- South Sudan
- Tanzania
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 25.77 million hectares against 24.00 million hectares in Tanzania, a difference of 1.77 million hectares.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 29th and Tanzania ranks 32nd of 209 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.77 million hectares | 23.96 million hectares | 1.81 million hectares | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 25.77 million hectares | 24.00 million hectares | 1.77 million hectares | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher area of permanent meadows and pastures, South Sudan or Tanzania?
- South Sudan, at 25.77 million hectares against 24.00 million hectares in Tanzania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in area of permanent meadows and pastures between South Sudan and Tanzania?
- 1.77 million hectares, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tanzania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Tanzania rank globally for area of permanent meadows and pastures?
- South Sudan ranks 29th and Tanzania ranks 32nd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Area of permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This is the land used for livestock grazing. The total land use for livestock farming is higher as it additionally requires cropland used to grow animal feed.