How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP

Burkina Faso

0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Tanzania

0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Burkina Faso rank

32nd

Tanzania rank

30th

Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP over time

Burkina Faso
Tanzania

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 32nd and Tanzania ranks 30th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Tanzania	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0144 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0052 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0092 hectares per US$ of GDP	Burkina Faso
1970s	0.0078 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0043 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0035 hectares per US$ of GDP	Burkina Faso
1980s	0.0032 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0021 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP	Burkina Faso
1990s	0.0022 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0028 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2000s	0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0014 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2010s	0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2020s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp, Burkina Faso or Tanzania?: Tanzania, at 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp between Burkina Faso and Tanzania?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Tanzania rank globally for area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp?: Burkina Faso ranks 32nd and Tanzania ranks 30th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-of-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/burkina-faso/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-of-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/burkina-faso/tanzania/">Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 194 places, 10,174 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Area of permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.