Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Equatorial Guinea
0.0027 hectares per person
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0043 hectares per person
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
187th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
185th

Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.0030.0050.0070.010.0130.015196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0043 hectares per person against 0.0027 hectares per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0016 hectares per person.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.6 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 185th of 197 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0096 hectares per person 0.0139 hectares per person 0.0043 hectares per person Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.0097 hectares per person 0.0116 hectares per person 0.0019 hectares per person Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.0078 hectares per person 0.0093 hectares per person 0.0015 hectares per person Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.0051 hectares per person 0.0075 hectares per person 0.0024 hectares per person Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0034 hectares per person 0.0063 hectares per person 0.0029 hectares per person Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.003 hectares per person 0.0051 hectares per person 0.0021 hectares per person Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0028 hectares per person 0.0045 hectares per person 0.0017 hectares per person Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0043 hectares per person against 0.0027 hectares per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0016 hectares per person, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 185th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-of-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-of-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Area of permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
hectares per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 11,286 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Area of permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.