San Marino vs Tokelau: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type
San Marino
0 hectares
in 2024
Tokelau
0 hectares
in 2024
San Marino rank
148th
Tokelau rank
148th
Area burned by wildfires by land cover type over time
- San Marino
- Tokelau
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tokelau, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 148th and Tokelau ranks 148th of 225 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher area burned by wildfires by land cover type, San Marino or Tokelau?
- San Marino, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tokelau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in area burned by wildfires by land cover type between San Marino and Tokelau?
- 0 hectares, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Tokelau?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do San Marino and Tokelau rank globally for area burned by wildfires by land cover type?
- San Marino ranks 148th and Tokelau ranks 148th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of shrubland and grassland burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes open and closed shrublands and grasslands without a significant tree cover.