Nauru vs Solomon Islands: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type
Nauru
0 hectares
in 2024
Solomon Islands
0 hectares
in 2024
Nauru rank
148th
Solomon Islands rank
148th
Area burned by wildfires by land cover type over time
- Nauru
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 148th and Solomon Islands ranks 148th of 225 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 4.29 hectares | 4.29 hectares | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher area burned by wildfires by land cover type, Nauru or Solomon Islands?
- Nauru, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in area burned by wildfires by land cover type between Nauru and Solomon Islands?
- 0 hectares, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Solomon Islands?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Solomon Islands rank globally for area burned by wildfires by land cover type?
- Nauru ranks 148th and Solomon Islands ranks 148th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of shrubland and grassland burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes open and closed shrublands and grasslands without a significant tree cover.