Faroe Islands vs Nauru: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type
Faroe Islands
0 hectares
in 2024
Nauru
0 hectares
in 2024
Faroe Islands rank
148th
Nauru rank
148th
Area burned by wildfires by land cover type over time
- Faroe Islands
- Nauru
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Nauru, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Faroe Islands ranks 148th and Nauru ranks 148th of 225 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher area burned by wildfires by land cover type, Faroe Islands or Nauru?
- Faroe Islands, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in area burned by wildfires by land cover type between Faroe Islands and Nauru?
- 0 hectares, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Nauru?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Faroe Islands and Nauru rank globally for area burned by wildfires by land cover type?
- Faroe Islands ranks 148th and Nauru ranks 148th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of shrubland and grassland burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes open and closed shrublands and grasslands without a significant tree cover.