Cape Verde vs Lebanon: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type
Cape Verde
0 hectares
in 2025
Lebanon
0 hectares
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
146th
Lebanon rank
146th
Area burned by wildfires by land cover type over time
- Cape Verde
- Lebanon
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Lebanon, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lebanon ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 146th and Lebanon ranks 146th of 225 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 241.49 hectares | 241.49 hectares | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 169.58 hectares | 169.58 hectares | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 93.02 hectares | 357.77 hectares | 264.75 hectares | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher area burned by wildfires by land cover type, Cape Verde or Lebanon?
- Cape Verde, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in area burned by wildfires by land cover type between Cape Verde and Lebanon?
- 0 hectares, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Lebanon?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Lebanon rank globally for area burned by wildfires by land cover type?
- Cape Verde ranks 146th and Lebanon ranks 146th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area of shrubland and grassland burnt by wildfires each year, in hectares. Includes open and closed shrublands and grasslands without a significant tree cover.