How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and New Zealand?

24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Morocco vs New Zealand: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita

Morocco

0 hectares per person

in 2025

New Zealand

0 hectares per person

in 2025

Morocco rank

133rd

New Zealand rank

136th

Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita over time

Morocco
New Zealand

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.3 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Morocco ahead.

Morocco ranks 133rd and New Zealand ranks 136th of 206 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Morocco	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	New Zealand
2010s	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0002 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	New Zealand
2020s	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0002 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita, Morocco or New Zealand?: Morocco, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita between Morocco and New Zealand?: 0 hectares per person, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and New Zealand?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do Morocco and New Zealand rank globally for area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita?: Morocco ranks 133rd and New Zealand ranks 136th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs New Zealand: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-burned-by-wildfires-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/morocco/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-burned-by-wildfires-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/morocco/new-zealand/">Morocco vs New Zealand: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 206 places, 4,944 data points, 2002–2025
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Area burned by wildfires by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.