Australia vs Namibia: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita

Australia
1.69 hectares per person
in 2025
Namibia
0.694 hectares per person
in 2025
Australia rank
1st
Namibia rank
4th

Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Namibia
01234200220132025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.69 hectares per person against 0.694 hectares per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.996 hectares per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 2.4 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 4th of 206 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 2.03 hectares per person 1.96 hectares per person 0.0672 hectares per person Australia
2010s 1.76 hectares per person 1.69 hectares per person 0.0689 hectares per person Australia
2020s 1.28 hectares per person 0.8795 hectares per person 0.3976 hectares per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita, Australia or Namibia?
Australia, at 1.69 hectares per person against 0.694 hectares per person in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita between Australia and Namibia?
0.996 hectares per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Namibia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do Australia and Namibia rank globally for area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita?
Australia ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 4th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Namibia: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-burned-by-wildfires-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/australia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-burned-by-wildfires-by-land-cover-type-per-capita/australia/namibia/">Australia vs Namibia: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, per capita
Unit
hectares per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 4,944 data points, 2002–2025
Last refreshed

Area burned by wildfires by land cover type divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.