New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate

New Zealand
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Zimbabwe
5.42 % change on previous year
in 2025
New Zealand rank
50th
Zimbabwe rank
47th

Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate over time

  • New Zealand
  • Zimbabwe
-100-50050100200320142025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 5.42 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 5.42 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

New Zealand ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 158 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s -69.79 % change on previous year 11.95 % change on previous year 81.74 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s -13.31 % change on previous year -0.9105 % change on previous year 12.4 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 0.3997 % change on previous year 6.74 % change on previous year 6.34 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate, New Zealand or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 5.42 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate between New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
5.42 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
How do New Zealand and Zimbabwe rank globally for area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate?
New Zealand ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-burned-by-wildfires-by-land-cover-type-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-burned-by-wildfires-by-land-cover-type-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/zimbabwe/">New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 3,175 data points, 2003–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Area burned by wildfires by land cover type. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.