How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Caledonia?

7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs New Caledonia: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate

Latvia

-100 % change on previous year

in 2025

New Caledonia

-100 % change on previous year

in 2025

Latvia rank

137th

New Caledonia rank

137th

Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate over time

Latvia
New Caledonia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 137th and New Caledonia ranks 137th of 158 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	111.11 % change on previous year	-96.86 % change on previous year	207.97 % change on previous year	Latvia
2010s	-100 % change on previous year	-80 % change on previous year	20 % change on previous year	New Caledonia
2020s	433.33 % change on previous year	-99.1 % change on previous year	532.43 % change on previous year	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate, Latvia or New Caledonia?: Latvia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate between Latvia and New Caledonia?: 0 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Caledonia?: 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
How do Latvia and New Caledonia rank globally for area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate?: Latvia ranks 137th and New Caledonia ranks 137th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs New Caledonia: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-burned-by-wildfires-by-land-cover-type-annual-growth-rate/latvia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/area-burned-by-wildfires-by-land-cover-type-annual-growth-rate/latvia/new-caledonia/">Latvia vs New Caledonia: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Area burned by wildfires by land cover type, annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 158 places, 3,175 data points, 2003–2025
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Area burned by wildfires by land cover type. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.