Mongolia vs South Sudan: Average area burnt per wildfire
Mongolia
488.62 hectares
in 2026
South Sudan
476.37 hectares
in 2026
Mongolia rank
14th
South Sudan rank
15th
Average area burnt per wildfire over time
- Mongolia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 488.62 hectares against 476.37 hectares in South Sudan, a difference of 12.25 hectares.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 14th and South Sudan ranks 15th of 182 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 817.84 hectares | 544.49 hectares | 273.35 hectares | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 604.9 hectares | 496.09 hectares | 108.8 hectares | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average area burnt per wildfire, Mongolia or South Sudan?
- Mongolia, at 488.62 hectares against 476.37 hectares in South Sudan as of 2026.
- What is the difference in average area burnt per wildfire between Mongolia and South Sudan?
- 12.25 hectares, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Mongolia and South Sudan rank globally for average area burnt per wildfire?
- Mongolia ranks 14th and South Sudan ranks 15th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average area burnt per wildfire. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average area burnt per wildfire, in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 18 September 2026.