Israel vs East Timor: Average area burnt per wildfire
Israel
162.2 hectares
in 2026
East Timor
164.73 hectares
in 2026
Israel rank
160th
East Timor rank
158th
Average area burnt per wildfire over time
- Israel
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 164.73 hectares against 162.2 hectares in Israel, a difference of 2.53 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 160th and East Timor ranks 158th of 182 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 276.92 hectares | 158.37 hectares | 118.55 hectares | Israel |
| 2020s | 252.76 hectares | 166.16 hectares | 86.6 hectares | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average area burnt per wildfire, Israel or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 164.73 hectares against 162.2 hectares in Israel as of 2026.
- What is the difference in average area burnt per wildfire between Israel and East Timor?
- 2.53 hectares, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Israel and East Timor rank globally for average area burnt per wildfire?
- Israel ranks 160th and East Timor ranks 158th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average area burnt per wildfire. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average area burnt per wildfire, in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 18 September 2026.