Iraq vs Uganda: Average area burnt per wildfire
Iraq
224.45 hectares
in 2026
Uganda
222.64 hectares
in 2026
Iraq rank
112th
Uganda rank
113th
Average area burnt per wildfire over time
- Iraq
- Uganda
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 224.45 hectares against 222.64 hectares in Uganda, a difference of 1.81 hectares.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Uganda ahead.
Iraq ranks 112th and Uganda ranks 113th of 182 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 243.39 hectares | 239.38 hectares | 4.01 hectares | Iraq |
| 2020s | 244.56 hectares | 233.58 hectares | 10.98 hectares | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average area burnt per wildfire, Iraq or Uganda?
- Iraq, at 224.45 hectares against 222.64 hectares in Uganda as of 2026.
- What is the difference in average area burnt per wildfire between Iraq and Uganda?
- 1.81 hectares, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uganda?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Iraq and Uganda rank globally for average area burnt per wildfire?
- Iraq ranks 112th and Uganda ranks 113th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average area burnt per wildfire. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average area burnt per wildfire, in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 18 September 2026.