Greenland vs Lebanon: Average area burnt per wildfire
Greenland
164.5 hectares
in 2026
Lebanon
163 hectares
in 2026
Greenland rank
154th
Lebanon rank
155th
Average area burnt per wildfire over time
- Greenland
- Lebanon
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 164.5 hectares against 163 hectares in Lebanon, a difference of 1.5 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lebanon ahead.
Greenland ranks 154th and Lebanon ranks 155th of 181 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 428.4 hectares | 77.98 hectares | 350.42 hectares | Greenland |
| 2020s | 136.75 hectares | 106.4 hectares | 30.35 hectares | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average area burnt per wildfire, Greenland or Lebanon?
- Greenland, at 164.5 hectares against 163 hectares in Lebanon as of 2026.
- What is the difference in average area burnt per wildfire between Greenland and Lebanon?
- 1.5 hectares, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Lebanon?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2026.
- How do Greenland and Lebanon rank globally for average area burnt per wildfire?
- Greenland ranks 154th and Lebanon ranks 155th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average area burnt per wildfire. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The average area burnt per wildfire, in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 07 August 2026.