Ecuador vs Pakistan: Average area burnt per wildfire
Ecuador
213.77 hectares
in 2026
Pakistan
213.25 hectares
in 2026
Ecuador rank
125th
Pakistan rank
126th
Average area burnt per wildfire over time
- Ecuador
- Pakistan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 213.77 hectares against 213.25 hectares in Pakistan, a difference of 0.52 hectares.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Pakistan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 125th and Pakistan ranks 126th of 182 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 228.53 hectares | 219.72 hectares | 8.81 hectares | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 232.73 hectares | 225.23 hectares | 7.5 hectares | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average area burnt per wildfire, Ecuador or Pakistan?
- Ecuador, at 213.77 hectares against 213.25 hectares in Pakistan as of 2026.
- What is the difference in average area burnt per wildfire between Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 0.52 hectares, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for average area burnt per wildfire?
- Ecuador ranks 125th and Pakistan ranks 126th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average area burnt per wildfire. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average area burnt per wildfire, in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 18 September 2026.