Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Average area burnt per wildfire
Cuba
290.58 hectares
in 2026
Zimbabwe
285.71 hectares
in 2026
Cuba rank
79th
Zimbabwe rank
81st
Average area burnt per wildfire over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 290.58 hectares against 285.71 hectares in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4.87 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Cuba ranks 79th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 182 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 250.2 hectares | 385.33 hectares | 135.13 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 276.82 hectares | 346.18 hectares | 69.37 hectares | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average area burnt per wildfire, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Cuba, at 290.58 hectares against 285.71 hectares in Zimbabwe as of 2026.
- What is the difference in average area burnt per wildfire between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 4.87 hectares, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for average area burnt per wildfire?
- Cuba ranks 79th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average area burnt per wildfire. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average area burnt per wildfire, in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 18 September 2026.