Cuba vs Rwanda: Average area burnt per wildfire
Cuba
290.58 hectares
in 2026
Rwanda
282.86 hectares
in 2026
Cuba rank
79th
Rwanda rank
82nd
Average area burnt per wildfire over time
- Cuba
- Rwanda
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 290.58 hectares against 282.86 hectares in Rwanda, a difference of 7.72 hectares.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 79th and Rwanda ranks 82nd of 182 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 250.2 hectares | 210.65 hectares | 39.54 hectares | Cuba |
| 2020s | 276.82 hectares | 245.74 hectares | 31.08 hectares | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average area burnt per wildfire, Cuba or Rwanda?
- Cuba, at 290.58 hectares against 282.86 hectares in Rwanda as of 2026.
- What is the difference in average area burnt per wildfire between Cuba and Rwanda?
- 7.72 hectares, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Rwanda?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Cuba and Rwanda rank globally for average area burnt per wildfire?
- Cuba ranks 79th and Rwanda ranks 82nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average area burnt per wildfire. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average area burnt per wildfire, in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 18 September 2026.