Australia vs Namibia: Average area burnt per wildfire
Australia
614.28 hectares
in 2026
Namibia
545.95 hectares
in 2026
Australia rank
9th
Namibia rank
11th
Average area burnt per wildfire over time
- Australia
- Namibia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 614.28 hectares against 545.95 hectares in Namibia, a difference of 68.33 hectares.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 11th of 182 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 894.45 hectares | 666.93 hectares | 227.52 hectares | Australia |
| 2020s | 790.14 hectares | 653.73 hectares | 136.41 hectares | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average area burnt per wildfire, Australia or Namibia?
- Australia, at 614.28 hectares against 545.95 hectares in Namibia as of 2026.
- What is the difference in average area burnt per wildfire between Australia and Namibia?
- 68.33 hectares, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Namibia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Australia and Namibia rank globally for average area burnt per wildfire?
- Australia ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 11th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average area burnt per wildfire. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average area burnt per wildfire, in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 18 September 2026.