Malta vs Nauru: Annual area burnt by wildfires
Malta
0 hectares
in 2026
Nauru
0 hectares
in 2026
Malta rank
172nd
Nauru rank
172nd
Annual area burnt by wildfires over time
- Malta
- Nauru
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Nauru, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Nauru ahead.
Malta ranks 172nd and Nauru ranks 172nd of 248 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 24.86 hectares | 0 hectares | 24.86 hectares | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual area burnt by wildfires, Malta or Nauru?
- Malta, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Nauru as of 2026.
- What is the difference in annual area burnt by wildfires between Malta and Nauru?
- 0 hectares, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nauru?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Malta and Nauru rank globally for annual area burnt by wildfires?
- Malta ranks 172nd and Nauru ranks 172nd of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual area burnt by wildfires. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area burnt by wildfires in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 07 August 2026.