Iceland vs Kiribati: Annual area burnt by wildfires
Iceland
0 hectares
in 2026
Kiribati
0 hectares
in 2026
Iceland rank
172nd
Kiribati rank
172nd
Annual area burnt by wildfires over time
- Iceland
- Kiribati
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Kiribati, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 172nd and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 248 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,558 hectares | 0 hectares | 3,558 hectares | Iceland |
| 2020s | 13,617 hectares | 0 hectares | 13,617 hectares | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual area burnt by wildfires, Iceland or Kiribati?
- Iceland, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Kiribati as of 2026.
- What is the difference in annual area burnt by wildfires between Iceland and Kiribati?
- 0 hectares, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kiribati?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Iceland and Kiribati rank globally for annual area burnt by wildfires?
- Iceland ranks 172nd and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual area burnt by wildfires. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area burnt by wildfires in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 07 August 2026.