Guam vs Tokelau: Annual area burnt by wildfires
Guam
0 hectares
in 2026
Tokelau
0 hectares
in 2026
Guam rank
172nd
Tokelau rank
172nd
Annual area burnt by wildfires over time
- Guam
- Tokelau
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tokelau, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Guam ahead.
Guam ranks 172nd and Tokelau ranks 172nd of 248 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 860.25 hectares | 0 hectares | 860.25 hectares | Guam |
| 2020s | 271.71 hectares | 0 hectares | 271.71 hectares | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual area burnt by wildfires, Guam or Tokelau?
- Guam, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tokelau as of 2026.
- What is the difference in annual area burnt by wildfires between Guam and Tokelau?
- 0 hectares, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Tokelau?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2026.
- How do Guam and Tokelau rank globally for annual area burnt by wildfires?
- Guam ranks 172nd and Tokelau ranks 172nd of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual area burnt by wildfires. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Area burnt by wildfires in hectares. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 07 August 2026.