Nauru vs Suriname: Anemia risk groups
Nauru
22.5
in 2023
Suriname
22.2
in 2023
Nauru rank
120th
Suriname rank
123rd
Anemia risk groups over time
- Nauru
- Suriname
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 22.5 against 22.2 in Suriname, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Nauru ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.45 | 23.72 | 4.27 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 19.63 | 19.48 | 0.15 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 21.6 | 21.27 | 0.325 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher anemia risk groups, Nauru or Suriname?
- Nauru, at 22.5 against 22.2 in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in anemia risk groups between Nauru and Suriname?
- 0.3, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Suriname?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Suriname rank globally for anemia risk groups?
- Nauru ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 123rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Anemia risk groups. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.