Cuba vs Nauru: Anemia risk groups
Cuba
22.2
in 2023
Nauru
22.5
in 2023
Cuba rank
123rd
Nauru rank
120th
Anemia risk groups over time
- Cuba
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 22.5 against 22.2 in Cuba, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 123rd and Nauru ranks 120th of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.24 | 19.45 | 4.79 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 19.57 | 19.63 | 0.06 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 21.27 | 21.6 | 0.325 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher anemia risk groups, Cuba or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 22.5 against 22.2 in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in anemia risk groups between Cuba and Nauru?
- 0.3, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Nauru?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Nauru rank globally for anemia risk groups?
- Cuba ranks 123rd and Nauru ranks 120th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Anemia risk groups. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.