Comoros vs Malta: All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary
All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary over time
- Comoros
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 93.7% against 93.1% in Comoros, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 80.1% | 19.9% | Comoros |
| 2000s | 84.3% | 90.0% | 5.7% | Malta |
| 2010s | 96.0% | 85.9% | 10.1% | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary, Comoros or Malta?
- Malta, at 93.7% against 93.1% in Comoros as of 2017.
- What is the difference in all staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary between Comoros and Malta?
- 0.6%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Malta?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
- How do Comoros and Malta rank globally for all staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary?
- Comoros ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
All staff (teacher and non-teachers) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. Divide all staff compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/