Pakistan vs Sierra Leone: Total dependency ratio

Pakistan
70.2%
in 2023
Sierra Leone
71.6%
in 2023
Pakistan rank
46th
Sierra Leone rank
44th

Total dependency ratio over time

  • Pakistan
  • Sierra Leone
020406080100195019862023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 71.6% against 70.2% in Pakistan, a difference of 1.4%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 46th and Sierra Leone ranks 44th of 236 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 5 and Sierra Leone in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1950s 78.5% 72.6% 5.8% Pakistan
1960s 82.0% 75.5% 6.5% Pakistan
1970s 88.7% 82.8% 5.9% Pakistan
1980s 87.9% 86.8% 1.1% Pakistan
1990s 90.9% 89.0% 1.9% Pakistan
2000s 82.1% 89.2% 7.1% Sierra Leone
2010s 74.2% 82.1% 8.0% Sierra Leone
2020s 71.1% 73.5% 2.4% Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total dependency ratio, Pakistan or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 71.6% against 70.2% in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in total dependency ratio between Pakistan and Sierra Leone?
1.4%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sierra Leone?
74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Sierra Leone rank globally for total dependency ratio?
Pakistan ranks 46th and Sierra Leone ranks 44th of 236 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Total dependency ratio. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Total dependency ratio
Unit
%
Source
UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
236 places, 17,464 data points, 1950–2023
Last refreshed

The number of children (under 15) and people aged 65 and over per 100 working-age people (aged 15 to 64).