Ecuador vs El Salvador: Total dependency ratio

Ecuador
49.5%
in 2023
El Salvador
49.7%
in 2023
Ecuador rank
171st
El Salvador rank
168th

Total dependency ratio over time

  • Ecuador
  • El Salvador
0255075100195019862023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 49.7% against 49.5% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was El Salvador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 171st and El Salvador ranks 168th of 236 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador El Salvador Difference Ahead
1950s 89.6% 91.7% 2.2% El Salvador
1960s 94.4% 97.7% 3.3% El Salvador
1970s 90.1% 95.4% 5.3% El Salvador
1980s 80.0% 83.8% 3.9% El Salvador
1990s 70.6% 76.7% 6.1% El Salvador
2000s 63.4% 69.4% 5.9% El Salvador
2010s 55.8% 56.8% 1.0% El Salvador
2020s 50.4% 50.7% 0.2% El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total dependency ratio, Ecuador or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 49.7% against 49.5% in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in total dependency ratio between Ecuador and El Salvador?
0.2%, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for total dependency ratio?
Ecuador ranks 171st and El Salvador ranks 168th of 236 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Total dependency ratio. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Total dependency ratio
Unit
%
Source
UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
236 places, 17,464 data points, 1950–2023
Last refreshed

The number of children (under 15) and people aged 65 and over per 100 working-age people (aged 15 to 64).