Congo vs Cote d'Ivoire: Total dependency ratio

Congo
77.9%
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire
78.1%
in 2023
Congo rank
29th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
28th

Total dependency ratio over time

  • Congo
  • Cote d'Ivoire
0255075100195019862023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 78.1% against 77.9% in Congo, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Congo ranks 29th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 236 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Cote d'Ivoire in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1950s 81.2% 83.6% 2.4% Cote d'Ivoire
1960s 89.8% 86.7% 3.0% Congo
1970s 95.5% 92.8% 2.8% Congo
1980s 93.7% 100.8% 7.1% Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 87.9% 97.2% 9.3% Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 79.6% 93.7% 14.1% Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 79.2% 82.0% 2.8% Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 79.2% 79.5% 0.3% Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total dependency ratio, Congo or Cote d'Ivoire?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 78.1% against 77.9% in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in total dependency ratio between Congo and Cote d'Ivoire?
0.2%, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Cote d'Ivoire?
74 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
How do Congo and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for total dependency ratio?
Congo ranks 29th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 236 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Total dependency ratio. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Total dependency ratio
Unit
%
Source
UN, World Population Prospects (2024) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
236 places, 17,464 data points, 1950–2023
Last refreshed

The number of children (under 15) and people aged 65 and over per 100 working-age people (aged 15 to 64).