Côte d’Ivoire vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 27 - Origin and

Côte d’Ivoire
0.0693 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Uganda
0.0622 Percentage of GDP
in 2019
Côte d’Ivoire rank
20th
Uganda rank
23rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 27 - Origin and over time

  • Côte d’Ivoire
  • Uganda
00.0250.050.0750.1200020092019

How they compare

Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 0.0693 Percentage of GDP against 0.0622 Percentage of GDP in Uganda, a difference of 0.0071 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Côte d’Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.

Côte d’Ivoire ranks 20th and Uganda ranks 23rd of 152 countries.

Côte d’Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d’Ivoire Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0793 Percentage of GDP 0.0774 Percentage of GDP 0.0018 Percentage of GDP Côte d’Ivoire
2010s 0.0831 Percentage of GDP 0.0774 Percentage of GDP 0.0058 Percentage of GDP Côte d’Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 27 - origin and, Côte d’Ivoire or Uganda?
Côte d’Ivoire, at 0.0693 Percentage of GDP against 0.0622 Percentage of GDP in Uganda as of 2019.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 27 - origin and between Côte d’Ivoire and Uganda?
0.0071 Percentage of GDP, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d’Ivoire and Uganda?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Côte d’Ivoire and Uganda rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 27 - origin and?
Côte d’Ivoire ranks 20th and Uganda ranks 23rd of 152 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 27 - Origin and destination of added value — Total added value from countries within the same AUC region embedded in national exports. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d’Ivoire vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 27 - Origin and. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-27-origin-and-destination-of-added-value-total/cote-d-ivoire-2/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-27-origin-and-destination-of-added-value-total/cote-d-ivoire-2/uganda/">Côte d’Ivoire vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 27 - Origin and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 27 - Origin and destination of added value — Total added value from countries within the same AUC region embedded in national exports
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
225 places, 4,467 data points, 2000–2019
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 27 shows statistics on the origin and destination of added value, whether it is domestic, in neighbouring countries, within the same continent, or outside the continent. This is an indication of the degree to which national economies participate in regional and global value chains.