Mauritania vs Russian Federation: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Mauritania
103,070 Hectares
in 2020
Russian Federation
1.71 million Hectares
in 2020
Mauritania rank
18th
Russian Federation rank
2nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Mauritania
  • Russian Federation
0500.0k1.0M1.5M200020102020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 1.71 million Hectares against 103,070 Hectares in Mauritania, a difference of 1.61 million Hectares.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 16.6 times Mauritania's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 18th and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 28 groups.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 103,070 Hectares 1.71 million Hectares 1.61 million Hectares Russian Federation
2010s 103,070 Hectares 1.71 million Hectares 1.61 million Hectares Russian Federation
2020s 103,070 Hectares 1.71 million Hectares 1.61 million Hectares Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Mauritania or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 1.71 million Hectares against 103,070 Hectares in Mauritania as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Mauritania and Russian Federation?
1.61 million Hectares, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Russian Federation?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Mauritania and Russian Federation rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Mauritania ranks 18th and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Russian Federation: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/mauritania-2/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/mauritania-2/russian-federation/">Mauritania vs Russian Federation: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.