Marshall Islands, Republic of the vs Monaco: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Marshall Islands, Republic of the
18 Hectares
in 2020
Monaco
7.49 Hectares
in 2020
Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank
170th
Monaco rank
172nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Marshall Islands, Republic of the
  • Monaco
05101520200020102020

How they compare

Marshall Islands, Republic of the currently reports 18 Hectares against 7.49 Hectares in Monaco, a difference of 10.51 Hectares.

That makes Marshall Islands, Republic of the's figure about 2.4 times Monaco's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Marshall Islands, Republic of the has been ahead every year.

Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 170th and Monaco ranks 172nd of 175 countries.

Marshall Islands, Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Marshall Islands, Republic of the Monaco Difference Ahead
2000s 18 Hectares 2.39 Hectares 15.61 Hectares Marshall Islands, Republic of the
2010s 18 Hectares 7.49 Hectares 10.51 Hectares Marshall Islands, Republic of the
2020s 18 Hectares 7.49 Hectares 10.51 Hectares Marshall Islands, Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Marshall Islands, Republic of the or Monaco?
Marshall Islands, Republic of the, at 18 Hectares against 7.49 Hectares in Monaco as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Monaco?
10.51 Hectares, with Marshall Islands, Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Monaco?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Marshall Islands, Republic of the and Monaco rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 170th and Monaco ranks 172nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Marshall Islands, Republic of the vs Monaco: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/marshall-islands/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/marshall-islands/monaco/">Marshall Islands, Republic of the vs Monaco: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.