Maldives vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Maldives
30 Hectares
in 2020
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
39 Hectares
in 2020
Maldives rank
163rd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
160th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Maldives
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
010203040200020102020

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 39 Hectares against 30 Hectares in Maldives, a difference of 9 Hectares.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.3 times Maldives's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.

Maldives ranks 163rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 160th of 170 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2000s 30 Hectares 39 Hectares 9 Hectares Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 30 Hectares 39 Hectares 9 Hectares Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 30 Hectares 39 Hectares 9 Hectares Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Maldives or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 39 Hectares against 30 Hectares in Maldives as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Maldives and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
9 Hectares, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Maldives and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Maldives ranks 163rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 160th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/maldives/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/maldives/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Maldives vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.