Belize vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Belize
2,297 Hectares
in 2020
North Macedonia, Republic of
2,571 Hectares
in 2020
Belize rank
135th
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
133rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Belize
  • North Macedonia, Republic of
01.0k2.0k3.0k200020102020

How they compare

North Macedonia, Republic of currently reports 2,571 Hectares against 2,297 Hectares in Belize, a difference of 274 Hectares.

That makes North Macedonia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, North Macedonia, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 135th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 133rd of 175 countries.

North Macedonia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize North Macedonia, Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 2,297 Hectares 2,571 Hectares 274 Hectares North Macedonia, Republic of
2010s 2,297 Hectares 2,571 Hectares 274 Hectares North Macedonia, Republic of
2020s 2,297 Hectares 2,571 Hectares 274 Hectares North Macedonia, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Belize or North Macedonia, Republic of?
North Macedonia, Republic of, at 2,571 Hectares against 2,297 Hectares in Belize as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Belize and North Macedonia, Republic of?
274 Hectares, with North Macedonia, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and North Macedonia, Republic of?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Belize and North Macedonia, Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Belize ranks 135th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 133rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/belize/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/belize/north-macedonia/">Belize vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.